Showing posts with label financial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label financial. Show all posts

Saturday, November 15, 2008

The G20 Meets To Solve Global Financial Problems

Over this autumn weekend in Washington DC the leaders of a group of nations are meeting to plot the recovery of the global economy. I am impressed that they are taking ‘a’ weekend to solve a problem that appears to be bigger than all of us and continues to grow at an alarming rate. I want to remind you that the Earth turns ever so slowly in the grand scheme for things – 24 little hours to be exact, and I don’t see how so much can be accomplished over the weekend. What, does everybody have to be back behind their presidential desk on Monday?

Why is it with things that have been discovered to be terribly wrong do we feel that this gives us the expectation that it can be righted in a period of time that is shorter than the time that it took for the problem to get screwed up enough that we recognize it as a problem? It is as if no one was paying any attention to the situation until it became impossible to do business as usual, after which; everyone became cognizant of a problem and now we have to rush and fix it. The problem that prevails now is how are we going to fix a problem that we never knew was a problem.

Am I confusing you? Good, because that is the problem. Everyone is confused as to how to fix it! As a boy, my Grandmother would send me into the garden that my grandparents had on the back forty with instructions to pick all of the ripe fruits and vegetables that we were going to use for the rest of the week. Being a city boy, I picked everything that resembled a ripe fruit or vegetable and returned to the house in five seconds flat. Of course, some of them were terribly green and my Grandmother took me to task regarding the picking of fruits and vegetables. She said that you must only pick what you need keeping in mind that there is a tomorrow.

The economies of all of the nations, both rich and poor are enlaced. Somebody drops a vase in Djibouti and an attendant is sent to clean it up in Kansas City, or Cartagena. What one country does regarding its trade policy effects all of the others trading around the globe eventually. Protectionism, a practice that helps one, is done at the expense of all others who would trade goods with that country. Transactions between countries afford one an advantage over the other if a trade imbalance can be sustained based upon the value of each country's currency. Countries that do not allow their currency to float on the market can be suspected of manipulating the market if they continue to support large trade deficits with trading partners China is a good example of this practice.

Since the dollar is the standard by which all other countries set the value of their currencies, it stands to reason that the best way to hedge the market to your advantage is devalue your currency in relationship to the standard. Another method of taking advantage of the market is to extract a profit at the expense of those with whom a country trades – OPEC has done just that. The down-side of these tactics is what the global market is experiencing today. The monopolization of the market by individuals interested in dominating the supply and demand equation is apparent. Greed is the other name that would fit well in explaining the current global situation.

As each entity squeezes the market to gain market share at the expense of all others, the flow of cash slows and credit expands. The exchange rate for the payment of debts due cannot keep pace with the amount of money owed. The trade deficit rises to the point that the country suffering from the trade imbalance can no longer make substantial payments against the deficit. The balloon eventually will burst; creating a financial situation that we are currently experiencing.

Many methods and remedies will be applied to this global economic situation with little success. The devaluation of the dollar is inevitable. The continued loss of jobs world-wide will indicate the lost of battlefront after battlefront. Without exception, the onset of recession will touch each country in turn as the Earth slowly turns. Just like day turns to night, so will the progression advance.

Prepare yourself as best you can…

Friday, September 12, 2008

What is the difference in rescuing homeowners...

What is the difference in rescuing homeowners from foreclosure as oppose to bailing out the banking institutions that made the bad loans to those who are losing their homes? How do we justify using taxpayers money to prop up financial institutions that are going under because of bad choices made by their CEOs? Why is not Congress investigating the Officers of these institutions with an eye toward prosecution? I have been asking myself these questions and more and here are my thoughts.

It would seem to me that if everybody was able to make his or her mortgage payments that we would not have this situation to began with – think about it! What if we retool every loan that was an ARM and automatically re-financed it for a fixed rate loan? And suppose we also re-negotiated the terms of the loan so that the loan payments could be reduced by extending the length of the loan – a thirty year now becomes a forty-five year loan. Suppose we instructed all banking institutions to exercise flexibility with each of its customers that are delinquent in terms of making it possible for that customer to keep his home. Of course, the person that has lost his job is without hope of being able to pay his mortgage, and as such, would not be a candidate for recovery.

If we did all of these supposed actions, or some of the supposed actions, then banks would continue to get money from their marginal loans and the banking institutions would gain time to bring this situation under control without the help of the government. What is causing the problem for everyone is the number of people that are not paying because the loan payment has escalated beyond the amount of money that they are making per month.

Bailing out the financial institutions is hopelessly impossible to fathom when you began to realize that these institutions will still have a list of properties that they will need to dump at less than value. How will the Treasury Department regain the money that was extended to these banking institutions in a vain attempt to rescue them? Why not let the owner keep the property and pay you something rather than repossessing the property with no further recourse to the shareholders of the bank/financial institutions?

For sure, the culprits in this grand scam are the banking institutions themselves. I am not so old as to not be able to recall this same situation occurring in the real estate industry of Japan. How did the Japanese get a grip on the disaster that they erected for themselves – they realized that saving the institutions was not the problem? They refinanced all of the loans of these over-appraised homes so that the responsibility for repaying the loan extended into the second, third, and in some instances, the fourth generations of families. That simple solution stopped the hemorrhaging of their banking institutions.

Congress, are you listening?